Therefore cars are less environmentally damaging than buses. American liberals can all too easily recognize and disparage the positive fetishism regarding guns, but can be blind to their own negative fetishism.
And whatever-you-want-to-call-it is back — unless you think a regime that practices assassination, unilateral war-making, unlimited surveillance, austerity imposition, and issues from a completely corrupt electoral process, etc.
It was always a conglomeration of State Militias. What would we be asking about why this is happening, about what might be causing more young men to engage in spates of seemingly senseless, suicidal-homicidal mass violence, about what we might do to recognize and eliminate, as far as possible, those causes?
Division The fallacy of division is the opposite of the Fallacy of Composition. This suggests that most people probably do not enjoy guns enough to justify keeping them around despite their costs.
What a stupid comparison. JW is also spot on on the pre Reagan era rullings of the court. Heller US In the current gun rights debate, one does not have to think too hard to catch the tiny little fact that anti-gun-rights liberals, besides not really being pacifists, are not really proposing to eliminate guns at all.
The text, the law, that the framers wrote now stands apart from and beyond their personal intentions. We need to concentrate on the mental-health aspects of the CT shooter and why his mother was stupid enough to train him in guns and give him access to guns when she knew he was a social socio-path and had other mental heatlh related issues.
They find that even after controlling for all of this stuff, there is still a significant correlation between gun ownership level and gun homicide rate. Understanding the dynamic of radical and revolutionary change, not repeating platitudes about how omnipotent is the state and how unchangeable is society, is really thinking historically.
Is there one liberal gun-control proposal being put forward that makes the teensiest move toward diminishing the use of guns, including military -style assault weapons, by the police? In Sweden and Switzerland you can own a gun or even in Israel, how many get killed there?
Does it make sense to have a citizen army made up of self-appointed soldiers who may or may not have a sound mind and who often buy into the NRA's delusional anti-government rhetoric that is so reminiscent of Timothy McVeigh's lunacy?
Content warning for discussion of suicide, murder, and race] I. Do you have what it takes to be a minuteman?
Don't even answer that, don't even speak, you and your ilk are what is wrong with the world today. The entire effect Vox highlights in their graph is due to gun suicides, but they are using it to imply conclusions about gun homicides.
Indeed it is because they are powerful and dangerous that they are the nexus of an important political right. Further, there is a correlation between gun ownership and total homicide rate, suggesting that the gun-gun-homicide correlation was not just an artifact of people switching from inferior weapons to guns while still committing the same number of murders.
Bombs are only used by terrorists so farnot by crazy people who want to commit suicide and take as many people as possible with them and get a lot of media attention at the same time.
This makes some intuitive sense. With only the counter-revolutionary politics. He echoed the "rational basis" theme of the Breyer dissent.Here is nice little android app application that helps you explore the age-old question, "Does God Exist?" (Google play store link, or apk download link).It starts by asking you to consider what you mean by God, then presents a series of observations.
As in the case of people in favor, people who are against gun control are also armed with arguments supporting their stand. Those who oppose it, argue such restrictions will only pressurize the law abiding citizens―not the criminals, and they are of no use.
Iranian Ayatollah Ali Khamenei used Twitter to slam American officials for not banning guns. Yes, the guy who operates a regime that regularly oppresses females and wants to annihilate Jews from the world thinks he has the moral superiority to lecture us. Few constitutional disputes maintain as powerful a grip on the public mind as the battle over the Second Amendment.
The National Rifle Association and gun-control groups struggle unceasingly over a piece of the political landscape that no candidate for the presidency--and few for Congress--can afford to ignore. Eight Arguments in Favor of Eating Meat and Objections Thereto.
Most of the following eight arguments came from a Contemporary Moral Issues class that I taught at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the Fall of I asked the students to give me their best arguments in favor of eating meat, and these are the results.
Dec 18, · In Japan, you cannot buy a handgun, much less an assault rifle. In fact, even off-duty police officers are banned from carrying guns. You can buy a shotgun or an air rifle, but it is not easy: First, you have to take a class and a written exam.Download